National Security Strategy Comparison

Mid-Term Essay Compare/ phone line atomic number 63an certification system (ESS) with US National warrantor dodge (NSS) By James E. McDonald Regional/Cultural Studies Lesson 03 24 Mar 2013 Instructor Col (ret) plainspoken Belote Air Command and Staff College blank space Learning Maxwell AFB, AL The credential Strategy of the United States has marked similarities and differences to the gage Strategy of atomic number 63. This can be effectively traced to the similarities and differences surrounded by the two cultures themselves, particularly in the pagan factors of religion, modernization, ethni city/ depicted objectism, and geography.The US and Europe countenance diverse responses to the modernization of warfare from handed-down (ships, armies, tanks, aircraft) to asymmetrical (terrorism, cyber-warfare), largely from differences in geography With the notable exceptions of Pearl Harbor and the humans Trade Center, our enemy threat has been thousands of miles away, plot Europe has seen two bloody cosmos wars and acts of terror committed right on home soil.However, for the purposes of this paper, I leave behind localize on religion and culturality/nationalism, and how these two factors coin strategic culture. Culture is nearly-valuable. It defines whats important to a group, or nation. It emerges in verbalize doctrine, laws, scheme. It defines who we ARE. There are common views, interests, priorities, and prolixity in both Security strategical documents. Major powers are at peace. The introduction economy has grown globalism is increasingly important. We mustiness reduce dependency on irrelevant energy.We have a commitment to league with distributively another(prenominal) (US and Europe) via NATO (Obama, 2010, 1-9) (European Security Strategy, 2003, 2-14). NATO has do a strong tie between the US and Europe since it was created to contain the Soviets, integrate Europe and the United States politic all toldy and militarily (Friedman , 2011, 1). In fact, For any kind of soldiers planning and operations with regard to Russia, the Europeans will prefer to act through NATO kinda than the EU. (Valesek, 2008, 1)In contrast to the above commonalities, the United States document, go acknowledging that no one nationno matter how powerfulcan go global scraps alone, repeatedly shows glimpses of flag-waving(a) overtones with statements such as, Our country possesses the attributes that have support our leadership for decadessturdy alliances, an unmatched military, the terra firmas largest economy, a strong and evolving democracy, and a dynamic citizenry. (Obama, 2010, 1-9). The European document, on the other hand, openly and repeatedly calls for Unification and Cooperation (European Security Strategy, 2003, 1-8).The United States can draw from European religious history and ethnical origin, which gives it roughly cultural similarities. At the same time, the make of our nation was so much to a capaciouser exten t new-fashioned, and so dramatically divergent from the number 1 of European history, that its no rarity there are fundamental differences in culture. Even before the Declaration of liberty (God and law referenced) or the US Constitution were drafted (freedom of religion), former(a) America was rooted in Christianity. The setoff Pilgrims fled religious persecution in Europe.Christian doctrine has been quoted in speeches given by American leaders from the beginning (Governor John Walthrop, Massachusetts Governor, 1630), to recent/present-day Presidents (Reagan, GW Bush, Obama), The United States has been referred to as something different, a shining example all the world to see and emulate, a city on a hill. (Walthrop, 1630, 1). America, from its beginnings to today, date welcoming diversity, continues to be a predominately Christian culture, allowing for religious overtones in national documents (mostly discernible through reference to values, and truth).Europe on the other hand, in its challenge to unify the 27 countries that form the European Union (Rosenberg, 2011, 1), must tread gently so as not to yield or anger any function of the contemporary combination of Christian, Muslim, and Secular cultures (Rubenstein, 2011, 1). both the US and Europe are ethnically and racially diverse. Many marvel at the ability to retain direction and pore in the face of such diversity. beforehand(predicate) America molded immigrants into a warming pot, mixing historical grow into a soup that became distinctly American.Nowadays, the preference is to hold on to ethnic differences and describe the result as a mosaic or salad bowl founder pieces that, when viewed as a whole, create a larger picture (Branigin, 1998). In break of this recent shift to retain ethnic individuality, America seems to successfully categorize this into its backwoodsman rugged individualist mentality, yet in shunning division along racial lines, manages to successfully embrace all groups into a sense of singular nationalism.Europe on the other hand, struggles to balance 27 nations, each with their own sense of nationalism, without giving meaningful preference to any one culture. The net impact of these religious and ethnic/ nationalist differences is that, yes, the US National Security Strategy reads differently than the European Security Strategy. The segmentation in background results in different wording and stance, different reasons for why we do what we do, and the desired result. This can cause misunderstanding, and fifty-fifty distrust between these two great entities.However, its important to conclude that overall, we twain have the same ultimate target a continued commitment to trans-atlantic relationship, globalized economy, lessen dependency on foreign energy, and, most importantly, peace and security to our world (Obama, 2010, 1-9) (European Security Strategy, 2003, 2-14). In conclusion, many world researchers (including Samuel P Huntington in hi s map of The sphere of Civilizations), when identifying cultural categories in the world, group the US, Canada, Greenland, Western Europe, Australia and new-made Zealand as the West (Huntington, 1997, 26).Due to the emphasis on strong religious roots, belief in right, manifest destiny, and ethnic diversity in the United States, our stated objectives and self-identified role in the world is unique. However, overall, European US strategy and culture are not so remarkably different. BIBLIOGRAPHY Branigin, William, The Myth of the Melting luck Americas Racial and heathenish Divides. Immigrants Shunning Idea of Assimilation (Washington, DC Washington Post, 25 May 1998), http//www. washingtonpost. com/wp-srv/national/longterm/meltingpot/melt0525a. htmEuropean Security Strategy, A Secure Europe in a Better World, (Brussels, 12 celestial latitude 2003), 2-14 Friedman, George, The Crisis of Europe and European nationalism (Austin, TX StratFor Global Intelligence, 13 September 2011), 1, http//www. stratfor. com/ each week/20110912-crisis-europe-and-european-nationalism Huntington, Samuel P. , The World of Civilizations The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York, NY Touchstone, 1997), 26-27 Obama, Barack, National Security Strategy (Washington, DC Whitehouse Archives, 2010), 1-9Rosenberg, Matt, European Union Countries (About. com, 09 December 2011), 1, http//geography. about. com/od/lists/a/eumembers. htm Rubenstein, Richard L. , Islam and Christianity The Roots of Europes Religious Identity (New incline Review, December 2011), 1, http//www. newenglishreview. org/custpage. cfm/frm/102790/sec_id/102790 Valesek, Tomas, Europes defense lawyers and its New Security Strategy (Center for European Reform Bulletin London, England, Dec 2007-Jan 2008), 1, http//gees. org/documentos/Documen-02705. pdf Walthrop, John, Modell of Christian Charity (Massachusetts, 1630), 1,